Critically designing and intervening within the material and immaterial domains of waste. As part of an aware design approach Lewis unpacks the manifold of determinations from which our society determines value.
Bucharest has an abundantly contentious relationship with signage and this is manifested architecturally, strewn across or precisely sewn into the urban fabric without consideration of the lived experience behind the promotions. This experience leaks into the local culture of the old town streets, gradual and considered in morphology, are cluttered with open invitations to express and cheap adoptions of foreign cultures. This displaces local cultural practices for tourist oriented desires and dilutes the surviving establishments as they peer out from behind the street signs and far stretching banners.
This architectural proposition can transform Dambovita into a socially equitable part of the city once again, where the focus is on collective ownership and responsible partnership development. Creating a social landscape ripe for architectural intervention. By designing for transparency, shared infrastructure, and regenerative practices, Bucharest can bridge social divides, fostering collaboration between government, empowered businesses, and active citizens.
The fictitious relationship with advertisement transgresses from the scale of the city down to the building. Advertisement sterilizes the ability for the building to co-determine a spatial relationship with people and place, the idealised and fixed states capitalised imagery subverts meaningful dialogue with the built form.
Translating the serendipitous pathways that bridge across the site was a key opportunity to redefine a neglected back of house ecology. Iterative and responsive design propositions were explored to best cultivate the sense of place associated with exchange.
Engaging with the misaligned as an interstitial space between the advertisement and that of the build presents an opportunity to be ‘Co-determined’, David Leatherbarrow’s notion of orientation in Architecture-Oriented-Otherwise, by using reciprocity as a vehicle for gaining participation with buildings as a communicative space where the conditions between building, people and place becomes a shared condition that ‘gives into what it lacks’. Giving into the physical constraints of the built form to accommodate for experience.
Site Plan
Site Photography – ‘Making do and getting by’
In reference to the photographic explorations of Richard Wentworth